Skip to main content

BallotQuestions.vote is an independent, nonpartisan tracker. It is not a government website and not an election authority. For official ballot information, contact your state election authority.

Initiative 645

Repeal of State Income Tax on High Earners and Prohibition on Individual Income Taxes Initiative

On the ballot

Washington · November 2026 general election · Citizen initiative · Election day November 3, 2026
Topics: Taxes and revenue

In plain language

Initiative 645 would repeal Washington's new 9.9 percent tax on individual income above $1,000,000 a year before it takes effect on January 1, 2028, and would prohibit the state and any city, county, or local jurisdiction from taxing individual income going forward. The tax it targets, enacted by the Legislature in 2026, is intended to fund school meals, childcare, and other programs. The state's Office of Financial Management estimates repeal would cut state revenue by about $11.4 billion from 2027 through 2031, reducing funding largely for K-12 education, higher education, and health and human services.

Fiscal impact

The Washington Office of Financial Management's fiscal impact statement estimates the initiative would reduce state revenue by $11,432,414,000 across state fiscal years 2027-2031, drawn from the state general fund, the federal general fund, and the fair start for kids account, with the first collections lost starting in state fiscal year 2029. It also projects a net state agency savings of about $150.5 million over the same five years from ending implementation of the repealed tax.

Summarized from the official fiscal analysis listed in the sources below. Figures are the state's, not this site's.

What supporters and opponents say

These are summaries of arguments made by the named organizations, drawn from the sources listed below. They are their claims, not this site's, and this site takes no position on the measure.

What supporters say

  • Brian Heywood, founder of Let's Go Washington, which filed and funded the initiative, says the new tax "is going to hit the economy" and that repeal is meant to stop the state from expanding taxation to other income levels: "It's not about rich guys. This is about unlocking the gate so they can tax everybody."

What opponents say

  • Gov. Bob Ferguson, who joined the "No on 645" campaign, says the choice is "between the future and the past" and that he would veto any future legislation lowering the tax's $1 million threshold, since the revenue is committed by law to specific programs.
  • The "No on 645" campaign, backed by the Washington Education Association, SEIU-affiliated unions, and the Washington Federation of State Employees, argues repeal would open an estimated $13 billion hole in the state budget, with roughly half of that tied to school funding, and would roll back expanded school meals, childcare and early-learning funding, and the Working Families Tax Credit.

Last updated . How this page is sourced and corrected is described in the correction policy.