Question 1
Question 1: Public Records Requirements for the Legislature and the Governor’s Office Initiative
On the ballot
Massachusetts · November 2026 general election · Citizen initiative · Election day November 3, 2026
Topics: Civil rights, Government structure
In plain language
Question 1 would apply the Massachusetts public records law to records held by the state Legislature and the governor's office, which are exempt from that law today. Papers, correspondence, financial records and similar documents held by those offices would become subject to public records requests. The measure sets out two exceptions: records related to the development of policy positions by legislators or the governor, and communications between a legislator's office and constituents about a constituent's access to government services. Massachusetts is the only state where the legislature, the governor's office and the judiciary are all exempt from the public records law.
Fiscal impact
No official fiscal note has been issued for this measure yet.
When the state publishes a fiscal analysis, it will appear here and be listed in the sources below.
What supporters and opponents say
These are summaries of arguments made by the named organizations, drawn from the sources listed below. They are their claims, not this site's, and this site takes no position on the measure.
What supporters say
- The Coalition for Healthy Democracy, which is running the campaign for Question 1, says Massachusetts is the only state that exempts the legislature, the governor and the judiciary from its public records law, and that the ballot question is the way to close that gap after repeated bills failed on Beacon Hill.
- State Auditor Diana DiZoglio (D), who contributed $150,000 from her campaign account to the effort, says documents she has sought for an audit of the Legislature are public records at every other entity that follows the public records law, and that voters should be able to obtain them directly.
- The League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, Act on Mass, Progressive Massachusetts and the Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance have each said they support the measure.
What opponents say
- Senate President Karen Spilka (D) says the petition as written may not exclude confidential constituent information in every circumstance, and that much of a legislative office’s work involves personal matters such as immigration status or domestic abuse.
- The Massachusetts Senate challenged the petition before the Supreme Judicial Court; in April 2026 the court declined to rule on it, saying it would wait to see whether voters approve the law.
Official ballot language
The certified ballot text is not yet available for this measure. Once the state certifies it, the verbatim wording will appear here.
Sources
Everything on this page traces to these sources. Follow them to read the original documents.
- Massachusetts Elections Division, Secretary of the Commonwealth — Elections and Voting
- Massachusetts Elections Division — Ballot Question Numbers Assigned for November Ballot
- Massachusetts Attorney General — Ballot Initiatives Submitted for the 2026 Biennial Statewide Election
- Massachusetts Attorney General — Petition 25-14: Initiative Petition for a Law to Improve Access to Public Records (full text)
- Ballotpedia — Massachusetts Question 1, Public Records Requirements for Legislature and Governor’s Office Initiative (2026)
- WBUR — Mass. is set to see 9 ballot questions this fall. One in particular could upend how Beacon Hill works
- Boston Herald — SJC weighs in on legislative stipends, access to Legislature’s public records ballot questions
Last updated . How this page is sourced and corrected is described in the correction policy.